Friendly Competition - continued

I would like to first thank everyone for their wonderful comments and suggestions to my last post.  The four of us got together this past weekend for some fun and we talked about your ideas.  We decided to hold the contest next weekend and to use Trivial Pursuit as our game.  After much discussion, we decided that the teams will be men vs women.  Couple vs couple presented some interesting possibilities, but Carol and I really want it to be a battle of the sexes.  We also feel that we can win :-).  The next decision concerned what edition of Trivial Pursuit to use.  Between the three households, we have a number of sets of cards, including:  Sports, Baby Boomer, Silver Screen, TV, Juniors, and Family editions.  The men, of course, wanted Sports.  Carol and I wanted Silver Screen.  Neither one of those seemed fair.  Again, after discussion, we settled on either the Baby Boomer or TV edition.  We voted and it ended up a tie.  A coin toss made Baby Boomer the winner.   Carol and I are very comfortable with that, as are Barry and Henry.

We then discussed what we will play for.  That created a very interesting discussion because we had to weigh the reality that either team could win lose.  What we might want as winners could feel very different as losers!  We finally settled on the following parameters, as of now:

• The game will take place at Henry's home were we have the benefit of his playroom and extensive amount of equipment.
• Carol, Barry, and I can also bring any toys or equipment that we wish to supplement what is there.
• The losing team must submit during a two hour period to anything desired by members of the winning team.
• Each member of the losing team must submit to anything requested by either member of the winning team.  However, each member of the winning team has veto power over anything that s/he feels is inappropriate.  For example, if the women win and Carol requests something of Barry that I am uncomfortable with, I can veto it.
• We also established some hard limits.  This list may also expand before next Saturday.  At this time the hard limits are:
• no vaginal sex unless it is between Barry and me or Henry and Susan
• no oral sex between non-mates unless the giving party consents and it is OK with his/her mate
• no anal sex with a woman unless it is with the winner's mate (we did not limit pegging of the men)
• if any sexual contact is involved between non-mates, all four of us must be in the room when it takes place 
• any spanking of a woman must be with just the hand or the use of a previously agreed upon "light" implement (we will designate them before the contest begins)

I'm sure that we will have additions to the rules before we begin on Saturday, but I think we have a basic agreement in place.  I also think that each side will have a very competitive desire to win!

I'll let you know what happens.  We all think it will be fun.

Susan

How about Some Friendly Competition -- FEEDBACK Requested

Carol and Henry, as well as Barry and I, have been enjoying a comfortable winter.  Barry's maintenance spankings have continued, keeping him well mannered and behaved.  He really seems to thrive on and love being spanked, especially if it is not a full blown punishments spanking (which he has seemed to learn how to avoid).  The four of us have also been enjoying some fun role play situations together and are looking for new ideas to keep things spicy.

Barry recently suggested that we consider some type of friendly competition.  He also suggested that a Trivia Pursuit game might be a good source of competition.  We have all played that game years ago, but not recently.  Also, none of us claim to be very good at it, so it seems like it would offer a reasonably level playing field.  We all seem to be agreement on that, so now we are considering the make-up of the teams (such as couple vs couple or men vs. women) and what the prize should be.

Under serious consideration are:

• Men vs Women, with the losers having to completely submit to whatever the winners desire that evening.  There would be no restrictions on what the winners could require or do, unless the spouse of a loser felt uncomfortable with something that was being required of his/her mate.  For example, if the women are victorious, I could object to and block something that Carol wanted to do to Barry.  If Barry objected to something, he could not say 'no' unless I felt it was inappropriate.

• Couple vs Couple, with the losing couple being required to completely submit to the winning couple.  Again, there would be no restrictions unless a member of the winning couple felt uncomfortable with something his/her spouse was requiring of a member of the losing couple.  For example, if Barry and I are victorious, Barry could object to something that I wanted to do to Henry or Carol.  If they objected to something that I wanted to do, they could not say 'no' unless Barry felt it was inappropriate.

We have had several discussion about which competition would be the most fun, as well as about whether there should be any hard limitations about what the winners can require, especially with respect to sexual activities.  At the moment, Carol and I would like some hard limits specified.  However, Barry and Henry are comfortable with relying on the ability of their spouse's objections to keep things under control.

This has been an interesting exercise in finding a new way of raising the bar.  Consequently, we have decided to share our thoughts and request feedback from our readers.  We are not asking for a vote, but for thoughtful input that we want to consider before making our final decision.

We look forward to hearing from you,

Susan.

An Interesting Night

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.